tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11295909.post116218600825716929..comments2024-02-23T03:28:33.435-05:00Comments on Culture Industry: Hyphen-ingMark Scrogginshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01431113440875342809noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11295909.post-30116927901023214082010-09-16T16:56:42.476-04:002010-09-16T16:56:42.476-04:00I'm so surprising because of the great way thi...I'm so surprising because of the great way this man is thinking that should be because he's the best poet who I've read, he is very careful to refers to other poets. <a href="http://www.citratesildenafil.com/" rel="nofollow">Sildenafil Citrate </a>carlohttp://www.citratesildenafil.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11295909.post-1162402667364875782006-11-01T12:37:00.000-05:002006-11-01T12:37:00.000-05:00Oh indeed, Alex -- I've got those lines starred in...Oh indeed, Alex -- I've got those lines starred in my own copy of Triumph of Love, as well. In a review of Speech, Speech! a couple years back, I speculated that the texture of Hill's recent work could be compared to either a) GM Hopkins rewritten by Bruce Andrews or b) Ruskin confronting the internet.Mark Scrogginshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01431113440875342809noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11295909.post-1162400461742095262006-11-01T12:01:00.000-05:002006-11-01T12:01:00.000-05:00Mark, your mention of Geoffrey Hill on the back of...Mark, your mention of Geoffrey Hill on the back of a previous post's reference to the "grim one's" Fors Clavigera reminded me of these lines of Hill:<BR/><BR/>Ruskin's<BR/>Wedded incapacity, for which he has been scourged<BR/>many times with derision, does not<BR/>render his vision blind or his suffering<BR/>impotent. Fellow-labouring master-<BR/>servant of Fors Clavigera, to us he appears<BR/>some half-fabulous field-ditcher who prised<BR/>up, from a stone-wedged hedge-root, the lost<BR/>amazing crown.<BR/><BR/>I'd tend to go along with that.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11295909.post-1162214714645011532006-10-30T08:25:00.000-05:002006-10-30T08:25:00.000-05:00I;m not quite sure what you mean by 'wholly', Mark...I;m not quite sure what you mean by 'wholly', Mark -<BR/><BR/>"And I have yet to read any poet who wholly satisfies me. (Perhaps Bunting, Blake, and Dickinson come closest.)"<BR/><BR/>I'm guessing you mean something like the recognisable textual signature of the poet as seen throughout their work, rather than "all their poems".<BR/><BR/>I think I'd be frightened if I found a poet whose work _always_ satisfied me completely & in every mood.Edmund Hardyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00577772055947332383noreply@blogger.com