tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-112959092024-03-06T23:58:54.056-05:00Culture Industrythere is no wealth but lifeMark Scrogginshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01431113440875342809noreply@blogger.comBlogger985125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11295909.post-46197901997215578192017-07-22T11:58:00.001-04:002017-07-22T11:58:32.891-04:008. Summer camp<div class="_39k5 _5s6c">
<div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
Last weekend I picked up my younger daughter from her “performing arts” summer camp in the Catskills; yesterday my older daughter got back on a Greyhound from her oceanography summer camp at Woods Hole. Tomorrow I send her off to another camp, and then Tuesday I see the younger one off to yet another camp in New Hampshire. </div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
I didn’t “do” summer camps when I was a kid. I suspect my parents didn’t see the point in paying good money to get me out of their hair, when I was so quiet and introverted that I could be relied on to shut myself up in my room with my books and records and comic books all summer. It’s true that during high school I spent most weekdays with my Latin club associates at our Latin teacher’s house, doing “study groups” in preparation for the end-0f-summer national Latin club convention competitions. And one summer I spent a couple of days at a church-sponsored summer camp nearby, just to find out what it was like (I didn’t like it one bit).</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
I’ve always thought of the Orono University of Maine/National Poetry Foundation “decades” conferences as a kind of concentrated “poetry summer camp.” I went to my first one in 1993, a conference on poets of the 1930s, and it’s not exaggerating to say that it changed my life. I was astonished by how many Zukofsky papers had been presented there (I’d just finished an LZ dissertation); walking on campus at twilight, I said to Peter Quartermain, “someone ought to edit an LZ volume from these.” “You do it,” he said, and I was astonished at the audacity of the idea—me, a nobody... That became <i><span class="_4yxp">Upper Limit Music</span></i>, my first book.</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
I came back over the years, sometimes talking about LZ, sometimes about other poets. The conferences were a wonderful, concentrated three-ring circus of poetic interest—poets I’d read for years and held in breathless awe, critics and scholars whose work I’d admired from afar, and most importantly what seems like scores of younger scholars and poets who’ve become what I think of as my own “cohort” in the poetry world.</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
Burt Hatlen, who ran the NPF and edited <span class="_4yxp">Sagetrieb</span> and seemingly did everything useful and good—except for attending to publishing his own multitudinous essays in book form—was the linchpin of those conferences. I missed him last month in Orono, at the “Poets and Poetics of the 1990s” conference, and it made at times for a bittersweet feeling. Yes, it was a very good conference: smaller than I had remembered previous events being, but with a perhaps more concentrated dose of poetic energy. A series of wonderful readings, illuminating papers, wonderful conversations.</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
Oddly perhaps, this was the first Orono conference I’ve been to where I didn’t to some degree feel like an outsider, an intruder, someone faking his way into the inner circles. I’m not sure why that was; perhaps it’s merely a matter of time: if you hang around long enough, the work you’ve done—as flawed and flimsy as you know it to be—acquires a kind of acceptance, becomes a part of the furniture. It was a very good time.</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
So thank you, Carla Billetteri, Steve Evans, Ben Friedlander, and Jennifer Moxley. I hope you’ve gotten some well-deserved rest.</div>
</div>
</div>
Mark Scrogginshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01431113440875342809noreply@blogger.com18tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11295909.post-15641695796018959272017-07-22T11:56:00.002-04:002017-07-22T11:56:46.103-04:007. Celebrities<div class="_39k5 _5s6c">
<div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
[This note dates from a month ago; I haven't been keeping up with this cross-posing business very well.] </div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
My brushes with celebrities have been few and far between. We were on the East Side the other week, walking past the Campbell funeral home, and I thought <i><span class="_4yxp">someone hip must have died—I’ve never seen so many hipsters in ties smoking outside of here</span></i>. And then, lo and behold as we turned onto Madison, there were Bruce Springsteen and Patti Scialfa loading themselves into a big black SUV, presumably for the ride back to New Jersey, or perhaps the interment.</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
The one that sticks in my mind happened in Orono, Maine, at the National Poetry Foundation “American Poetry in the Fifties” conference a bit over twenty years ago. I was in a crowded room, with far too many academics and poets and far too much booze, amusedly watching a Hugh MacDiarmid scholar hitting on an avant-garde poet, when someone poked me and said, “Look, there’s Becky!”</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
He pointed at a young blonde woman across the room, conversing intently with a knot of poet-types. Yes, I said, she looks exactly like Becky, the older daughter in <span class="_4yxp">Roseanne</span>. “No,” said my friend, “that <span class="_4yxp">is</span> Becky. That’s the actress. She’s in college now, and she’s interested in Beat Poetry. So she came up to Orono to hang out with Beat Poets, and learn stuff.”</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
So I looked things up (harder then in those pre-Wikipedia days), and found that Lecy Goranson was indeed an undergrad at Vassar, an English major no less. Good for her, I thought at the time—and a good choice of conferences to attend. The MLA, for instance, would be just the place to kill dead any young person’s passionate interest in contemporary writing.* But the Orono conferences—free-wheeling interactions of living poets, critics, theorists, places where at times one could see literary history actually in the making—that’s something else altogether.</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
Looking forward to being in Maine next week, in short. Keeping my eyes open for celebrities!</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
<br /></div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
*I’ve been to plenty of MLAs, and had just wonderful (and abysmally awful) times—but the ambient job-market angst and savage careerism on display... well...</div>
</div>
</div>
Mark Scrogginshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01431113440875342809noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11295909.post-13970949547384544072017-06-10T16:40:00.004-04:002017-06-10T16:40:52.157-04:006. Long haul<div class="_39k5 _5s6c">
<div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
I’ve just finished the 42,000+ lines of William Morris’s <i><span class="_4yxp">The Earthly Paradise</span></i>, volumes 3 through 6 in the big collected works. There was no prize at the end of the last volume, no badge I could stick on my lapel: “I FINISHED <i><span class="_4yxp">THE EARTHLY PARADISE</span></i>!” I suppose I’ve joined a small and select club; how many people, in 2017, have read this gargantuan Victorian poem? I know one personally, and have met a couple of Victorian scholars whom I’m sure have read it; but I can’t imagine that there are more than a few hundred others.</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
Strangely enough, it’s (mostly) hasn’t felt like a slog, or an unending burden. Rather—since I’ve paced my reading out over six weeks or so—it’s been a rather charming evening’s (or morning’s) recourse: a half hour here, an hour there. The lines melt away beneath the reading eye, the pages seem to turn themselves. Which makes it I suppose the sort of “popular” reading Ron Silliman described all those years ago in “Disappearance of the Word, Appearance of the World.” Poetry as easy reading; poetry lite?</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
But I understand why the book was such a bestseller, at least on the level of readability. Would I read it again? Not straight through, certainly; but there are passages, and individual tales, that I know I’ll revisit. Maybe not soon—the poem as a whole has such a strong and bitter flavor of mortality that it’s thrown me into a dark mood, from which I suspect I’ll have to extricate myself with a blast of Frank O’Hara.</div>
</div>
</div>
Mark Scrogginshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01431113440875342809noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11295909.post-55491573296289441382017-06-10T16:39:00.003-04:002017-06-10T16:39:35.794-04:005. Note on Boredom<div class="_39k5 _5s6c">
<div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
[prefatory to a longer note on boredom]</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
I was at a mini-conference on the long poem, in the city, at a famous university, a few months back. A critic-scholar professor X (not his real initial) was in the chair. Two poets read. The first, Y (not his real initial), was a conceptualist, who read a long piece generated from a much shorter source text by a complex and somewhat mechanical procedure. The second, Z (not his real initial), a Language Poet, read a long piece “guided”—by some extent—by procedure, but relying upon old-fashioned “compositional” skills.</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
Afterwards, X opened the Q&A period with a comment on how his own attention had wandered. <i><span class="_4yxp">I found myself</span></i>, he said (though I’m paraphrasing), <i><span class="_4yxp">tuning out now and then, losing the thread. And I’m wondering how you guys build that inevitable “tuning out” into your conception of the poem, that moment when the audience or reader loses focus on what’s going on</span>.</i></div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
Y grinned and nodded throughout his comment. Z knit his brow, and answered: <i><span class="_4yxp">No, no, not at all, I’d hope for the reader to be paying attention all the way through.</span></i></div>
</div>
</div>
Mark Scrogginshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01431113440875342809noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11295909.post-72088673162592977692017-06-09T00:26:00.002-04:002017-06-09T00:26:31.005-04:004. Eyes<div class="_39k5 _5s6c">
<div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
“This book seems to give me eyes.” —Charlotte Brontë, on John Ruskin’s <i><span class="_4yxp">Modern Painters</span></i></div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
<span class="_4yxp"> </span></div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
It’s all about <i><span class="_4yxp">seeing</span></i>, Ruskin argues in those first volumes, all about opening your eyes to the natural world and seeing it as it actually appears. That’s what J. M. W. Turner does in his paintings, says Ruskin. If a Turner doesn’t look like we conceive the world around us, the problem isn’t with the Turner, but with our conception of visual reality. Where do we get that everyday conception (the sky is blue, clouds are white, trees are mostly green, shadows are black, etc.)? It’s a shorthand, a reduction, derived from memories of our rare moments of actual looking and (more importantly) from representations of the world we’ve looked at—Old Master paintings, in short. “The Ancients,” Ruskin calls them.</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
It’s another battle of the Ancients and the Moderns, and the Moderns (with Turner at their head) come out on top this time. Turner can paint landscape, seascape, skyscape more truly than any other painter because he’s actually <i><span class="_4yxp">looked</span></i> at those things, seen them without the goggles of convention. <i><span class="_4yxp">Modern Painters</span></i> begins as a book-length cheering-session for Turner, but it turns into a course on how to look at nature—what nature “really” looks like.</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
“The greatest thing a human soul ever does in this world is to <i><span class="_4yxp">see</span></i> something, and tell what it <i><span class="_4yxp">saw</span></i> in a plain way. Hundreds of people can talk for one who can think, but thousands can think for one who can see. To see clearly is poetry, prophecy, and religion,—all in one.” </div>
</div>
</div>
Mark Scrogginshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01431113440875342809noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11295909.post-4866175038772408362017-06-08T16:14:00.000-04:002017-06-08T16:14:18.745-04:003. Divided<div class="_39k5 _5s6c">
<div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
Feeling strangely divided this late morning. After a few days of intense stretching exercises—many of them suggested by FB friends, some of them picked up from various physical therapy sites on the internet—my “ache” is amazingly diminished. By no means gone, but much better; I can now sleep on whichever side I find most congenial, at least.</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
I started the day by registering and reserving a hotel room for the Orono conference at the end of next month. I’d been heading into this with nothing but enthusiasm: I’ve been to I believe three previous “decades” conferences there, and found all of them wonderful, energizing events. Indeed, the first one I went to—the “1930s” conference, back in 1993—was a kind of blast-off moment in my academic life. <i><span class="_4yxp">Upper Limit Music: The Writing of Louis Zukofsky</span></i> came out of that conference, as did many friendships that I still value.</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
But last night I had a dream about this coming conference, a strange and surreal dream (as my dreams so often are), clearly inflected by what I’ve been reading (NK Jemisin’s excellent fantasy novel <i><span class="_4yxp">The Kingdom of Gods</span></i>) but also shot through with various run-of-the-mill self-doubts and diffidences. I won’t go into the details—they were remarkably crystalline, but very strange and disturbing—but they’ve left me with a very bad feeling looking forward to the end of the month. Then again, I suspect that bad feeling will only last a few hours.</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
On the other hand—since we’re speaking “divided”—I’m midway through a briefish prose piece that has me filled with unalloyed excitement. The last couple months have been very good in terms of intellectual work: First I completed a long-form review that had been bedeviling me for probably half a year (and the work I was reviewing had been lowering over me for far longer); writing the thing was agony and deep research, but I’m pretty proud of the finished product. Then I turned out another piece, a shorter review, which proved to be nothing but delight from start to finish. And now I’m in the midst of a piece which combines poetics, literary history, literary sociology, and Victorian stuff. The words don’t flow from my pen—it’s never a matter of “flow” with me, but painful coaxing—but the ideas are coming together in wonderful constellations. I can’t wait to get back to my desk.</div>
</div>
</div>
Mark Scrogginshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01431113440875342809noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11295909.post-34770542258188632172017-06-08T10:31:00.001-04:002017-06-08T10:31:54.246-04:002. Deterioration<div class="_39k5 _5s6c">
<div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
I’ve had pretty decent luck with the old machine—my body, that is—for never having taken particular care of it. I was not an “active” child or adolescent, never got into the habit of regular exercise. Most of the time, I simply ate whatever I wanted, as much as I wanted. For much of my adulthood, I was shall we say “portly”: never quite obese, but sometimes verging thereupon.</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
It’s only in the last ten years or so that I’ve taken to any sort of exercise regimen: first a decent amount of biking, then a stair-stepping machine (too bloody boring), then a fairly significant program of daily walking. Combined with an all-out effort to avoid junk food and between-meal snacks, I’ve managed to drop about forty pounds from my all-time high some six years ago. (I still think of myself, however, as a fat guy.)</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
But everything deteriorates over time. A couple of years back, I had what amounted to an inflamed coccyx; that wasn’t a bad thing—I spent most of my time teaching on my feet, and rigged out a standing desk for my work at home. That kept me off my bum most of the time, but lordy it hurt when I <i><span class="_4yxp">had</span></i> to sit for a long period, or at least it hurt in that particular spot.</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
The coccyx went away; then last year, shlepping the air conditioners from the third floor to the basement, and moving some cartons of LPs, I did something to my lower back that lasted for three weeks or so. (Expert tip: NEVER pack LPs in 12” x 18” boxes, unless you have someone stronger than me in mind to move them.) And that went away, as well.</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
So now it’s what I think is piriformis syndrome, brought on almost certainly by some peculiarity in my gait, or by my incessant walking. I can stand fine; I can walk fine; I can lie down more or less fine, except in a few very specific angles. But sitting—there’s the rub. I find myself fidgeting like a four-year-old, trying to find a comfortable position, trying to quell the dull ache in my left buttock.</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
I suspect this too shall pass, one way or another. And wonder what’s going to happen next.</div>
</div>
</div>
Mark Scrogginshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01431113440875342809noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11295909.post-7139556392676496742017-06-08T00:12:00.004-04:002017-06-08T00:12:28.502-04:001. Mammalian fauna<div class="_39k5 _5s6c">
<div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
When I first moved to Florida late last century, I was fascinated by the animals, more specifically by the reptilian-type animals. When I was a kid roaming the western Kentucky forests with my cousins, I’d see lots of water moccasins, even an occasional rattler, and of course the garden-variety black garden snakes. In my parents’ home in Tennessee, there was the occasional blue-bellied salamander. But nothing compared to the scaled denizens of south Florida: snakes, all manner of lizards—from tiny gecko-like things, to curly-tailed fist-sized bruisers, to the vast and intimidating iguanas that hung around the fringes of campus at Our Fair University.</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
Wild mammals were rarer: lots of raccoons and squirrels, of course, and an occasional feral cat. And plenty of possums (yes, marsupials, I know, but furry...). One of the pleasures of moving northeast has been becoming reacquainted with mammalian wildlife. We have the raccoons and squirrels of course, but there’s more. Just in our yard, on an almost daily basis we’re visited by an extremely shy woodchuck (he lives somewhere out back, I think) and an extremely cute rabbit. I’ve caught sight, on a number of occasions, of hasty pairs of chipmunks.</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
The other night, on one of my late night walks—probably around 11.30 or so—I was glancing down at my phone as I walked down the sidewalk (dark, not many streetlamps, but plenty of light for walking). I heard the rustle of a heavy body a few feet from me and froze—I’d almost walked into a dark-clad late-night runner the week before—and there, in the corner of the yard I was passing, not eight feet from me, was a fully-grown doe, no doubt browsing at someone’s landscaping. We stared at each other for a moment—no, not at all a James Wright moment—and then she bustled off.</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
</div>
<div class="_2cuy _3dgx _2vxa">
(The chipmunks scampered across the driveway as I was typing that last sentence.)</div>
</div>
</div>
Mark Scrogginshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01431113440875342809noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11295909.post-61613984998902389512017-06-08T00:11:00.001-04:002017-06-08T16:12:04.886-04:00cross-postingI haven't been good at keeping up the blog for the past—well, a long time. Recently, I started writing short notes on Facebook's "Notes" feature, and a gentle nudge from a friend reminded me that I was, in effect, blogging—only I was blogging on a platform that only my Facebook "friends," and others who use Facebook, could read. So I think I'm going to start cross-posting—composing on FB, whose interface I like rather better than Blogger, and then importing the posts here. I'll put the first (rather nugatory) one up now, and follow with the others I've done over the next few days. They're numbered, I suppose in imitation of Jeff Nunokawa's.Mark Scrogginshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01431113440875342809noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11295909.post-52768217075811963182017-05-11T09:29:00.000-04:002017-05-11T10:15:24.398-04:00the new Tsar<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjffFtSf_dseA3DDt8xt_Bl2xuk7eXNguV-Cq0wUxwYMdlpMIYpakIMMxdkB5V4lghZC_LK1n4vai4VTQp2-TSAO1FzxKE63va98LueS0-qF4U9mQkoqSQxw2eqTX6BnMbGQ-FQeA/s1600/Alexander_Kerensky_LOC_24416.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjffFtSf_dseA3DDt8xt_Bl2xuk7eXNguV-Cq0wUxwYMdlpMIYpakIMMxdkB5V4lghZC_LK1n4vai4VTQp2-TSAO1FzxKE63va98LueS0-qF4U9mQkoqSQxw2eqTX6BnMbGQ-FQeA/s320/Alexander_Kerensky_LOC_24416.jpg" width="214" /></a>Reading <a href="http://samizdatblog.blogspot.com/">Bob Archambeau</a>'s little memoir of Ron Ellingson and Chicago's Aspidistra Bookstore in Bob's latest collection, <a href="https://madhat-press.com/products/inventions-of-a-barbarous-age-by-robert-archambeau">Inventions of a Barbarous Age</a>, I'm reminded of various bookstores in which I've spent time over the years. There have been many—Blacksburg's Softcovers, Ithaca's Blue Fox, Boca's BookWise, and any number of places in Washington DC and New York City. I haven't often struck up relationships with booksellers, alas, though when I have—Dave Wulf of BookWise, Sean Norton of Reston's Book Alcove—I've valued them. For a long time I've written my name in books, along with date and place of acquisition. Not usually the precise bookshop—but I can usually remember that, oddly enough, just by handling the book.<br />
<br />
Reading Martin Gilbert's very long and not particularly good history of the First World War, I've gotten to the overthrow of the Tsar Nicholas and the Bolshevik revolution. Which reminded me, as it always does, of an incident in a bookshop in Alexandria, Virginia, a little over twenty years ago.<br />
<br />
It was an odd place—in a kind of anonymous office space, as I remember it: not really a retail center at all, but a unit of office space that was being used as a bookshop. Well-organized; much of the stock seemed to consist of Library of Congress extra copies, or so they were stamped. I came up to the counter with five books: Terence Irwin's <i>Aristotle's First Principles</i>, three volumes of Mallarmé's letters in the big French paperbacks, and a nice hardcover Grove Press de Sade, <i>120 Days of Sodom</i>.<br />
<br />
The proprietor was an old man, heavily overweight, bald on the crown though long-haired otherwise, speaking with a thick eastern European accent. He chuckled at the de Sade: "You better not let your girlfriend see that!" As I paid for my books, he rambled on about how long he'd been in America. Then, apropos of nothing in particular, he started telling me about his childhood in Russia, how he'd grown up in St. Petersburg. "One day, my mother takes me out to the street. She holds me up, and there is a big car passing by, and a man in it with a uniform and a crew-cut. 'Look,' she says, 'it is the new Tsar!'"<br />
<br />
He pauses. "It was Kerensky."<br />
<i> </i><br />
[Alexander Fyodorovich Kerensky (1881-1970), for something less than four months leader of the Russian provisional government after the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II; went into exile after being forced from power in the Bolshevik October Revolution of 1917]Mark Scrogginshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01431113440875342809noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11295909.post-90851836356033007532017-02-15T10:34:00.002-05:002017-02-15T10:42:39.318-05:00many Morrises<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh3R_gw8l-NXnXcEDhbdmtZ-t-0IqaYGsfMEpN8NJVzjAPQJj43tCPKsa1xYyXiQuizplQQbATyDbRzCW82eK7v8E2pO9bi0LnXheYYdFukS22pv3e2x1dhpjbfoDVmSrHcfTDayQ/s1600/16298397_10154104623806244_8708990445106358604_n.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="300" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh3R_gw8l-NXnXcEDhbdmtZ-t-0IqaYGsfMEpN8NJVzjAPQJj43tCPKsa1xYyXiQuizplQQbATyDbRzCW82eK7v8E2pO9bi0LnXheYYdFukS22pv3e2x1dhpjbfoDVmSrHcfTDayQ/s400/16298397_10154104623806244_8708990445106358604_n.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
Yes, that's the Cambridge Library Edition of William Morris — a nicely-produced, print-on-demand reprint of the twenty-four volume Collected Works his daughter May Morris edited early in the last century.<br />
<br />
I will admit that I was hoping for something rather more sumptuous in this edition; something more like the Ruskin Library Edition, with its endlessly informative introductions and its scrupulous footnotes. May Morris contents herself with reprinting the final versions of each of her father's texts, making note of some (but by no means all) of the variants in her intros. There are no footnotes, no illustrations to speak of. The typography is gorgeous, it's true, but this is a <i>reading</i> edition, not a state-of-the-art scholarly edition — as the Ruskin, over a hundred years after its publication, still remains.<br />
<br />
It's taken me a long time to come around to reading Morris, I'll admit, and I wonder why. He's always been there in the background of my consciousness. Maybe, I reflect, it's because there are so <i>many</i> Morrises — a different William Morris for every interest.<br />
<br />
•For those of us with radical tendencies, there's Morris the socialist. I'm also reading EP Thompson's biography of WM, in its second, revised 1977 edition. Thompson notes that he's ratcheted down the Marxism of the first 1950s edition, and has shortened the book, cutting out some of the details of Morris's socialist activities. But it's still over 800 pages long, jam-packed with analyses of Morris's readings of Marx, of how his work with the "anti-scrape" preservation society dovetails with his reading of Ruskin's socially-inflected work, etc. Morris is a foundational figure in English leftism, and there's no getting around that.<br />
<br />
•Morris the socialist bleeds into Morris the proto-alternative-history novelist, author of <i>News from Nowhere</i>, the one text of his that remains in print in the most editions. This one I happened to have read a few years back, with some enjoyment, though it's a book that's frankly rather devoid of tension or incident. <br />
<br />
•For readers of <i>Architectural Digest</i>, "Morris" means a kind of chair, or a family of wallpaper and fabric patterns — Morris the designer. That's probably the most widely known Morris. His design firm, founded in part to put into practice the craft-oriented principles of Ruskin's "The Nature of Gothic," ended up producing a kind of ubiquitous late-Victorian environmental decor.<br />
<br />
•There's Morris the rather interesting poet: the poems of <i>The Defence of Guenevere</i>, his first book, are quite excellent, tense exercises in Victorian medievalism. He's no Tennyson in music, and no Browning in psychological penetration, but there are some really wonderful moments throughout these poems. The longer narrative things — I've just embarked on <i>Jason</i>, volume 2 of the set — are far more languid, so far as I can tell, but still highly readable.<br />
<br />
•And then there's Morris the fantasist. My friends in the fantasy scholarship world recognize this Morris first and foremost: the guy who wrote these long prose romances like <i>The Waters of the Wondrous Isle</i> and <i>The Wood Beyond the World</i>. Thompson spends about six pages on these books, which take up several volumes in the Cambridge edition, but which loom far larger in the imagination of fantasy buffs (thanks largely I think to JRR Tolkien's enthusiasm for them).<br />
<br />
•Morris the translator: When he wasn't writing epic poems or vast prose romances, or designing furniture or weaving tapestries, Morris translated the <i>Iliad</i>, the <i>Odyssey</i>, the <i>Aeneid</i>, and a stack of Icelandic sagas — in the process introducing the sagas to the English-speaking world. The classical translations are no better than okay (LZ cites some in <i>A Test of Poetry</i>), but the sagas are quite impressive. <br />
<br />
In short, at least 6 overlapping Morrises, one it seems for almost any audience. I've known about each of them for ages, but they've never quite coalesced in my imagination into a single figure. Now they're beginning to, and I'm becoming more and more impressed with the man's energy and breadth.Mark Scrogginshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01431113440875342809noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11295909.post-2472512314485734182017-02-02T00:16:00.000-05:002017-02-15T00:12:09.129-05:00the letter I sent to Lamar Alexander (R-Tennessee)<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:auto;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:-536870145 1107305727 0 0 415 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:auto;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:-536870145 1073786111 1 0 415 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{mso-style-unhide:no;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
mso-default-props:yes;
font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;
mso-header-margin:.5in;
mso-footer-margin:.5in;
mso-paper-source:0;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
</style>
-->
<div class="MsoNormal">
Dear Senator Alexander,</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
One of the proudest mementos of my adolescence is a
photograph taken of me as a high school senior (public school) from
Clarksville, being congratulated by you in the governor's office in Nashville
for having been awarded a national merit scholarship. That picture must have
been taken in 1981 or 1982, and I treasure it. I have followed your career with
some interest since, and while we diverge on many political issues, I have
always believed that you have a strong and abiding commitment to public
education.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I beg you to reconsider your support for the
administration's nomination of Betsy DeVos as Secretary of Education. She has
spent her life attempting to undermine public education in the United States,
to reshape it according to profit-driven free market model that will in the
long run benefit only rich districts and rich parents. And she is patently unqualified for the position, as her testimony
before the Senate committee amply demonstrated. Not merely has she never
attended a public school or worked in the field of education, but she has no
grasp of, or evident interest in the real issues confronting public education
in this new century, only an ideologically-driven agenda.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
You have forged an impressive legacy in public service, and
have repeatedly demonstrated your commitment to our schools and our children.
Please don't destroy that legacy and betray that commitment by voting for Ms
DeVos.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Yours truly,</div>
<span style="font-family: "calibri"; font-size: 12.0pt;">Mark
Scroggins</span>
Mark Scrogginshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01431113440875342809noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11295909.post-50363406889695113472017-02-01T14:10:00.000-05:002017-02-01T14:11:23.393-05:00Trump and StyleThere's a video turning up frequently in my Facebook feed of the president praising Frederick Douglass in terms of astonishing banality: "Frederick Douglass is an example of somebody who’s done an amazing job and is being recognized more and more, I noticed."<br />
<br />
Okay, so he probably has no idea who Frederick Douglass was, or what he represents. He's been told this is a person who's important to some other people, and so the president is mechanically praising him, in the only vocabulary—impoverished, grade-school, business-oriented—he has at his command. And our response (rightly) is disbelief and ridicule.<br />
<br />
We—writers, academics, intellectuals—are for better or worse appalled at Trump's <i>style</i>. We hate his hairdo, his suits, his general demeanor. We find his gold-plated apartment a kind of over-the-top parody of what a 7-year-old imagines it's like to be rich. Many of us prefer Bernie Sanders's style-less, rumpled "style." (A prime manifestation of Castiligone's <i>sprezzatura</i>, a style achieved precisely without any of the effort that usually goes into achieving a "look.")<br />
<br />
There a kind of snobbishness here, as I'm nowhere near the first to point out. Whatever we don't have, we like to think we have <i>style</i>—if not sartorially (most poets and academics, myself included, are fashion disasters), then <i>verbally</i>. If we had the president's money, our apartments would be models of arts & crafts coziness, or coolly impressive midcentury modernist spaces. But barring wealth, we know language, and we bristle when we hear the repetitive, aggressive, and intellectually flattened bits of rhetoric that make up Trump's speech.<br />
<br />
But in order to resist this new regime, we've got to do our best to ignore the stylistic flourishes of its figurehead. Every moment we spend decrying the new gold drapes in the Oval Office, the president's too-long necktie (held together with scotch tape), the Rube Goldberg haystack of his bouffant, the ghastly spectacle of his Manhattan apartment, or the rather remarkable shallowness of his vocabulary, is a moment in which our attention has lapsed from the plans, policies, and appointees that are issuing from the White House.Mark Scrogginshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01431113440875342809noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11295909.post-63925719224860628112017-01-03T14:59:00.000-05:002017-01-03T14:59:03.156-05:00MLAI haven't been to the annual Modern Language Association conference for maybe six or seven years, but I'll be in Philadelphia later this week. It'll be my first visit in a long time that hasn't been overshadowed by job-market responsibilities and their attendant angst; and of course it'll be my first visit as a recovering academic—though I suppose, since I'm giving a paper at an academic conference, that sort of makes me an academic anyway.<br />
<br />
At any rate, I'll be talking about Peter O'Leary's dazzling poem <a href="http://culturalsociety.org/texts/poems/the-sampo-by-peter-oleary/"><i>The Sampo</i></a>. The talk's called "The 'twilight machine': Nonhuman Poetics in Peter O'Leary's <i>The Sampo</i>." Come hear me Thursday afternoon. Here's the first couple of paragraphs:<br />
<br />
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:auto;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:-536870145 1107305727 0 0 415 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:TimesNewRomanPSMT;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:auto;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:-536859921 -1073711039 9 0 511 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{mso-style-unhide:no;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
mso-default-props:yes;
font-size:10.0pt;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;
mso-header-margin:.5in;
mso-footer-margin:.5in;
mso-paper-source:0;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
-->
</style>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT;">Peter O’Leary—a devout but profoundly syncretic
(perhaps even heterodox) Roman Catholic poet—has long been devoted to investigating
the nonhuman. His first three collections, written very much under the
influence of his mentor the visionary late modernist poet Ronald Johnson, are
explorations of a deity conceived in emphatically non-anthropomorphic terms, if
mediated through centuries of religious tradition. In his fourth book, <i>Phosphorescence of Thought</i> (2013),
O’Leary brings his poetics to focus as much on the natural world as as the
supernatural: this long poem, modeled to some degree on Whitman’s <i>Song of Myself</i>, envisions the processual
whole of nature, from the minute details of the poet’s hikes along the Des
Plaines river (birds, the movement of water), to the chemical processes of life
itself, to the neural transactions by which human beings strive to make sense
of their environment, all as a manifestation of deity. </span></span></div>
<span style="font-size: small;">
</span><style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:auto;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:-536870145 1107305727 0 0 415 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:TimesNewRomanPSMT;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:auto;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:-536859921 -1073711039 9 0 511 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{mso-style-unhide:no;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
mso-default-props:yes;
font-size:10.0pt;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;
mso-header-margin:.5in;
mso-footer-margin:.5in;
mso-paper-source:0;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
-->
</style><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT;"><span> </span>This
ecopoetical shift in O’Leary’s work has ramified in interesting directions in
his latest publication, the</span><span style="line-height: 200%;">
2016 narrative poem <i>The Sampo</i>, which
adapts passages from the Finnish national epic the <i>Kalevala</i>. This poem marks a number of shifts in O’Leary’s writing. Perhaps
most notably, while his earlier poetry takes the lyrical, ruminative, and
paratactic forms characteristic of such (broadly speaking) modernist poets as
Johnson, Louis Zukofsky, Basil Bunting, and Wallace Stevens, <i>The Sampo</i> is a <i>narrative</i> poem: and a fantasy narrative, no less, a story that
might even be categorized among the much-reviled “sword and sorcery” subgenre
of fantasy. </span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="line-height: 200%;">And it gets better from there... </span></span></div>
Mark Scrogginshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01431113440875342809noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11295909.post-40901751964175492092016-12-30T23:41:00.000-05:002016-12-30T23:41:00.999-05:00year's end
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:auto;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:-536870145 1107305727 0 0 415 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:auto;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:-536870145 1073786111 1 0 415 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:Cambria;
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:auto;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:-536870145 1073743103 0 0 415 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{mso-style-unhide:no;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
mso-default-props:yes;
font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;
mso-header-margin:.5in;
mso-footer-margin:.5in;
mso-paper-source:0;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
-->
</style>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Cambria;">I used to post a year’s-end
list of books I’d read and been impressed by; 2016, however, has been such a
eventual year that it seems appropriate to get a bit more garrulous.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Cambria;">Yes, this has been a
strange year—in many ways, an awful year. I don’t really want to get into the
central event casting its shadow backward over everything that came before: the
election. Is it enough to say that I’m sad, and fearful, and sick at heart? I
have friends from most parts of the political spectrum, and no one I know—even
the dyed-in-the-wool conservatives, even those who hated Obama, and who loathed
Clinton—is particularly happy about Trump’s victory. I know there are Americans
out there who are delighted about the Trump win—but I’m afraid holding that
opinion is a deal-breaker for me: I want to know more <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">about</i> you, but I don’t really want to know you.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Cambria;">And then there were the
celebrity deaths. It’s an actuarial matter, of course. The generation born
after World War II, those who make up the vast majority of the stars of the pop
music of the 60s and 70s, are getting to be <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">that
age</i>. Some of them are dying early, as some members of every generation die.
That doesn’t change the fact that we’re moved at the unexpected passing of
people whom we’ve never actually met, but whose works and whose public personae
have had a huge impact on our own formation.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Cambria;">I can’t really overstate
what David Bowie’s music meant to me when I was young. The Berlin “trilogy” of
albums, especially—<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Low</i>, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">“Heroes” </i>, and <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Lodger</i>—were central to how I conceived of music, and art-making in
general, in my late teens. I hadn’t listened to his later work much when I
downloaded <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Blackstar</i>, and found
myself flattened by the power and subtlety of which Bowie was still capable. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Cambria;">I was unexpectedly moved
by the news of George Michael’s death. I can’t say I was a huge George Michael
fan—I don’t know that I ever bought one one of his records. But I listened
quite attentively and with much pleasure whenever his songs were played, and I
watched the videos on MTV (back when they played music videos) over and over
again. Watching them again, I realize how much those music videos—Michael’s,
but also Madonna’s, Howard Jones’s, Cyndi Lauper’s, and a host of others’—provided
a generation of viewers, me among them, not merely with a fashion sense, but
with a whole vocabulary of sexuality and interpersonal emotion.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Cambria;">In the literary world, the
passing that most moved me was that of Geoffrey Hill. I’d begun my exploration
of his poetry some 25 years ago with a kind of detachment—this isn’t really the
sort of thing that I’m into, but it’s definitely worth thinking about, and so
forth. Over the years, as Hill branched out in new directions, and as I did a
bit of maturing myself, his work became more and more important to me. I
suppose at the beginning of 2016 I’d have had to admit that no living poet’s
work meant more to me than his.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Cambria;">***</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Cambria;">But enough of deaths for
the moment. My life has changed over the past year. I suppose I’ve accomplished
things, though as is the way with publications, it’s rather more a matter of
things I’ve accomplished some time ago finally hitting print. I’m still kind of
gobsmacked to have had <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">three</i> books
published over a twelve-month period: <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Intricate
Thicket: Reading Late Modernist Poetries</i> from U of Alabama in late 2015, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Michael Moorcock: Fantasy, Fiction and the
World’s Pain</i> from McFarland a few months later, and <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">The Mathematical Sublime: Writing About Poetry</i> from MadHat just a
few weeks ago. Still pinching myself. Predictably, the Moorcock book is the one
that’s got the most reviews, on the blogosphere and the reading group websites
and the SF/fantasy world; <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Intricate
Thicket</i> seems to have sunk without a trace; I hope <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Mathematical Sublime</i> finds a few more readers.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Cambria;">More importantly: we have
thrown over our positions at Our Fair University, and moved to divide our time
between Manhattan and New Jersey. For better or worse, no more moaning about
Florida weather, Florida drivers, and (the lack of) Florida culture. I am
trying to retool myself as a New Yorker these days, with mixed success. I don’t
miss grading papers at all; I occasionally find myself missing teaching
students, but most of all I miss the colleagues I have come to value and love,
and I miss the proximity of the friends I’ve made over the last two decades,
though I hope to maintain the friendships.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Cambria;">***</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Cambria;">Moving twenty years worth
of books, papers, and musical instruments has been a profoundly disruptive
experience. Most of my books (including cartons and cartons of unread poetry)
have yet to be unpacked, and my usual pace of reading has been much retarded. So
finally, not a “best of 2016” list, but a list of some of the books of poetry
(not all of them first published this past year) that’ve impressed themselves
on me over the year:</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Cambria;">Eva Hooker, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Godwit</i> </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Cambria;">Geneva Chao, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">One of Us Is Wave One of Us Is Shore </i></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Cambria;">Norman Finkelstein, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">The Ratio of Reason to Magic: New and
Selected Poems</i></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Cambria;">John Matthias, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Complayntes for Doctor Neuro and Other Poems</i></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Cambria;">Peter O’Leary, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">The Sampo</i></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Cambria;">John Peck, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Cantilena</i></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Cambria;">J. H. Prynne, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">The White Stones</i></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Cambria;">Juliana Spahr, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">That Winter the Wolf Came</i></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Cambria;">Ken Taylor, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Self-Portrait as Joseph Cornell</i></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Cambria;">Elizabeth Robinson, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Counterpart</i></span></div>
Mark Scrogginshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01431113440875342809noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11295909.post-69248415529901061292016-11-09T20:47:00.001-05:002016-11-09T20:47:06.583-05:00poem draft, dated 11/4/16-11/9/16
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:auto;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:-536870145 1107305727 0 0 415 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:auto;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:-536870145 1073786111 1 0 415 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{mso-style-unhide:no;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
mso-default-props:yes;
font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;
mso-header-margin:.5in;
mso-footer-margin:.5in;
mso-paper-source:0;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
-->
</style>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";">And then there
was that time—<i>he’s telling</i></span></div>
<i>
</i><div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><i>someone, years
hence—he hopes to be</i>—when we all</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>ran a raging fever, when we slewed</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>from the gas range to the icebox,
when nothing,</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";">not even the
voice of our parents, could calm</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";">us down. You
hated me, she says, and I</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>hated everything you said. We barely
remembered</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>the commons, the playground, the
vacant</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 2;"> </span>lot, even as a concept.
Something was hiding</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 2;"> </span>in a corner of the
basement, misshapen and</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>scary, and it got out, made
skittering hoof-clicks</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>in the dark across the polished hall
floor, left</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";">a funny metallic
taste in the bottom of the water-</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";">cups. It’s not
that something happened, but that</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 2;"> </span>something had been
happening all</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 2;"> </span>along, growing up beside
us</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 2;"> </span>like an unnoticed
sibling or</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 2;"> </span>a spectral husband.
Corner- </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 2;"> </span>of-the-eye stuff, you
know?</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>The colder air braces you against</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>the fall, when it finally comes.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";">There’s a rabbit
in the backyard, nosing</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";">around among the
leaves you haven’t </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>raked. Mail stacked in the hall, a
dozen</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>files cluttering the desktop. You
shift</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";">and putter,
neaten up and put away.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";">This is no time
for pretending everything’s</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>changed or everything’s alright,
that the gears</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>have somehow slipped or the shiny
machinery’s</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";">broken.This is
how it’s supposed to work, this</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";">is where your
day-in-day-out has brought you.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 2;"> </span>The fever broke, <i>he
tells the child</i></span></div>
<i>
</i><div class="MsoNormal">
<i><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 2;"> </span>on his knee, just
nodding off</span></i></div>
<i>
</i><div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><i><span style="mso-tab-count: 2;"> </span>in sleepiness or
boredom</i>, and the sky</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 2;"> </span>was clear and pure and
clean.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 2;"> </span>We could count the fingers
before</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 2;"> </span>us, put one foot in
front</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 2;"> </span>of the other. We knew
our right</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>hand from our left, and our
neighbors</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>from our enemies. Who we were allowed</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";">to love, and who
was off limits. The rabbit</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";">is gone, and all
the little squabbling sparrows.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>The brilliant yellow leaves are
mostly fallen,</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>crunch damply under our waffled</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";">boot-heels, or
mutely let themselves </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";">be gathered in.
And down the street, the engine</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>is still running, solid and
remorseless.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>O David Kaufmann, sage and
bewildered</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";">lodestar of
these marginal notes, pray for us now</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";">and at the hour
of our waking, pray for us</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>before the Law and beyond the door</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>through which we passed unknowing.</span></div>
Mark Scrogginshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01431113440875342809noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11295909.post-79319658761510450002016-11-01T19:43:00.000-04:002016-11-01T19:43:04.361-04:00It's Alive! The Mathematic Sublime: Writing About Poetry<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;">My new collection of essays and reviews is out now: <a href="http://madhat-press.com/products/the-mathematical-sublime-by-mark-scroggins"><i>The Mathematical Sublime: Writing About Poetry</i></a>. (Those of you who are scared of math—count me as one—shouldn't be put off by the title: I guarantee, no equations!)</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;">What's in it, you ask? Well, taking a leaf from Bob Archambeau's book (or rather, his <a href="http://samizdatblog.blogspot.com/2016/10/inventions-of-barbarous-age-poetry-from.html">blog</a>, in which he describes his new book—published under the same imprint as <i>The Mathematical Sublime</i>, and featuring a shocking similar cover design—what I like to call "MadHat/Clarendon"), here's a rundown of the contents, so that you can find out what I have to say about your favorite poet or poetry critic:</span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"> </span><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Times New Roman";
panose-1:0 2 2 6 3 5 4 5 2 3;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:auto;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:50331648 0 0 0 1 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{mso-style-parent:"";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
h1
{mso-style-next:Normal;
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
page-break-after:avoid;
mso-outline-level:1;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-font-kerning:0pt;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:italic;}
p.MsoEndnoteText, li.MsoEndnoteText, div.MsoEndnoteText
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-parent:"";
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;
mso-header-margin:.5in;
mso-footer-margin:.5in;
mso-paper-source:0;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
</style>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><b>Introduction</b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;">[In which I explain how I came to poetry and to the various poets I write about, and what the whole "mathematical sublime business is about]</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoEndnoteText" style="line-height: 150%;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><b><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>1.
Reviews</b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><b>The Condition of Hebrew: Geoffrey
Hill, <i>Speech! Speech!</i></b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;">[In which Hill is compared to Bruce Andrews, but then I take that back.]<i> </i></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><b>A Tinkertoy Poetics: Charles
Bernstein, <i>All the Whiskey in Heaven</i></b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;">[Holy smoke! FSG has published a selected Charles Bernstein that isn't particularly user-friendly for typical FSG types!] </span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><b>Kedging in Time: John Matthias, <i>Kedging</i></b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;">[John Matthias continues being one of the most important late modernist American poets.] </span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><b>The New Colossus, Revisited:
Jonathan Barron and Eric Selinger, <i>Jewish American Poetry</i></b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;">[Jewish American poetry has been slighted; Barron and Selinger gives us a gigantic gumbo of evidence that it oughtn't be.] </span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><b>Passionate, Eccentric Reading:
Norman Finkelstein, <i>Not One of Them in Place</i></b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;">[Finkelstein offers a more focused genealogy of Jewish American poetry: can you say "Post-Objectivist"?] </span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><b>By the Rivers of Babylon: Maeera
Shreiber, <i>Singing in a Strange Land</i></b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;">[Shreiber gives Jewish American poetry yet another look, this time with a focus on the religious element.]</span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><b>Zuk and Ole Bill: <i>The Correspondence of William Carlos Williams and Louis Zukofsky</i></b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;">[These letters are too important not to have been published already; shame WCW didn't save LZ's letters to him more often.] </span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><b>A Poetics of Being: Peter Nicholls,
<i>George Oppen and the Fate of Modernism</i></b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;">[In this massively important book, we learn that Oppen never really read Hegel, but that he didn't need to.] </span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><b>Scars and Fascination: John
Wilkinson, <i>Proud Flesh</i><span style="font-style: normal;"> and </span><i>Lake
Shore Drive</i></b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;">[Wilkinson's poetry—even twenty years between these two collections—remains harsh, repellant, and fascinating.] </span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><b>Resignation and Independence: Robert
Archambeau, <i>The Poet Resigns</i></b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;">[A smorgasbord of critical forays; the close readings are more convincing than the broad generalizations, but it's nice someone is making the latter.] </span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><b>Twilight Gardening: Ronald Johnson,
<i>The Shrubberies</i></b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;">[Old men tend their gardens; old poets writing garden poetry.] </span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><b>Postmodern Poetry’s Blue Period:
Rachel Blau DuPlessis, <i>Blue Studios</i></b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;">[DuPlessis makes the essay new; and thinks eloquently about what's at stake in doing that.] </span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><b>Innovation’s Explainer: Peter
Quartermain, <i>Stubborn Poetries</i></b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;">[Nobody writes about weird poetry better than Quartermain, but can't we have a little <i>fun</i>?] </span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><b>The Book of Oz: Ronald Johnson, <i>ARK</i></b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;">[New edition of <i>ARK</i>! and why that's a very good thing.]<i> </i></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> <b> </b></span><b>2.
Essays</b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div class="MsoEndnoteText" style="line-height: 150%;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><b>Susan Howe’s Hauntologies</b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;">[Susan Howe, Shakespeare, Jacques Derrida, Ghost Box records, Harry Smith's <i>Anthology</i>—whole lotta hauntin' goin' on.] </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><b>The “half-fabulous field-ditcher”:
Ruskin, Pound, Geoffrey Hill</b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;">[Yes, Pound was a Ruskinian (without knowing it), but Geoffrey Hill knows it; gratuitous swipes at Cesare Pavese along the way.] </span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><b>The “net / (k)not – work(s)” of
Robert Sheppard’s <i>Twentieth Century Blues</i></b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;">[Sheppard writes a <i>book</i> which wants to be a hypertext, or maybe a labyrinth.] </span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><b>“I am not an occultist”: Robert
Duncan’s <i>H. D. Book</i></b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;">[No, Virginia, modernism was not a sweeping of the decks of late-Victorian fustian, a hygiene of language; it was a bunch of occultism and a big carnival of table-rapping seances. So sez RD.]<i> </i></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><b>The Master of Speech and Speech
Itself: Nathaniel Mackey’s “Septet for the End of Time”</b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;">[An early essay on an early Mackey chapbook; still very fond of this <span style="font-family: inherit;">piece</span>.] </span></div>
<div class="MsoEndnoteText" style="line-height: 150%;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><b><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>3.
100 Poem-Books</b></span></div>
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><br /></span><span style="font-size: small;">
</span><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;">[From the pages of Culture Industry itself, 100 micro- (and sometimes a bit longer) reviews of poetry books. Robert Christgau's "Consumer Guide" must have been somewhere in my mind writing these, but I don't assign letter grades. Mostly I don't write about what I don't like, though a few have crept in. Your book is probably noted here.]</span></span><br />
<span id="goog_935870742"></span><span id="goog_935870743"></span><br />Mark Scrogginshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01431113440875342809noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11295909.post-6836483079057370972016-11-01T19:40:00.000-04:002016-11-01T19:40:00.441-04:00repetitionRight now I'm working on a large essay-review, an attempt at coming to terms with a long and very complicated recent book of poetry. And it's a very, very <i>difficult</i> book, maybe one of the hardest I've ever read. So part of my essay is going to be an extended thinking-through of the issue of difficulty in poetry.<br />
<br />
I wrote a few sentences on it this afternoon, and looked up a few things, and then I realized, <i>I've been writing this passage, this essay, ever since I started my dissertation a million years ago! And God help me, I'm still writing it</i>. I found quotations and passages I can still stand by in a discarded early chapter of the dissertation (on Mallarmé); I found useful materials in the dissertation itself (which became my first real book).<br />
<i> </i><br />
Zukofsky says somewhere that every writer writes a single work her or his entire life, plays variations on a tiny number of themes. I suppose that's true on some level. And I can think of all kinds of smart critics whose work can be not so much summed up as exemplified in one or two concepts: Empson = ambiguity; Ricks = allusion; Bloom = Oedipal struggle. That's not fair, I know, but it's not particularly inaccurate, either.<br />
<br />
I'd always hoped to be not a hedgehog but a fox, darting from subject to subject, concept to concept. But I seem to be aging into a one-note calliope; or perhaps I'm just aging to the point where I recognize the themes my thinking has been circling around all along.<i></i>Mark Scrogginshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01431113440875342809noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11295909.post-14054411700457750032016-09-14T12:32:00.002-04:002016-09-14T12:34:12.074-04:00reading notes: Wyndham Lewis biographies<div class="Body1">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman";">Why am I reading
Wyndham Lewis?, you ask. Well, he represents a major hole in my knowledge of
modernism. (Or perhaps, more fairly, one of the many major holes...) I think I
admire his paintings and drawings more than those of any other English artist
of the first half of the twentieth century, but I haven't ever really gotten a
grip on his vast written corpus. I've read <i>The Apes of God</i></span><span style="font-family: "times new roman";">, <i>Blasting & Bombardiering</i></span><span style="font-family: "times new roman";">, <i>Tarr</i></span><span style="font-family: "times new roman";">, and quite a number of stray shorter
things, but I've never systematically tackled his works and his career. So I'm
starting that, and a fortuitous copy of Paul O'Keeffe's big biography</span><span style="font-family: "arial unicode ms";">—</span><span style="font-family: "times new roman";">hailed
by Laurence Rainey on the jacket</span><span style="font-family: "arial unicode ms";">—</span><span style="font-family: "times new roman";">was one entr</span><span style="font-family: "arial unicode ms";">é</span><span style="font-family: "times new roman";">e.</span></div>
<div class="Body1">
<br /></div>
<div class="Body1">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman";">I've finished the
six-hundred-odd pages of O'Keeffe now, and feel a bit more warmly toward it
then I did in my last post. It sent me back to <i>Tarr</i></span><span style="font-family: "times new roman";"> (which I'm in the middle of) and oddly
enough, it sent me back to Jeffrey Meyers's 1980 <i>The Enemy</i></span><span style="font-family: "times new roman";">, the first full-length biography of
Lewis, and until O'Keeffe, the biography of record. O'Keeffe clearly despises
Meyers's book; as I work my way through Meyers's account of events O'Keeffe
also describes, I recognize how much energy in <i>Some Sort of Genius</i></span><span style="font-family: "times new roman";"> has been devoted to setting the record
straight, to making clear that Meyers has gotten this or that sequence of events
or exchange of letters <i>wrong</i></span><span style="font-family: "times new roman";">.</span></div>
<div class="Body1">
<br /></div>
<div class="Body1">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman";">It's a perfectly
understandable impulse, even pardonable, but someone who comes to O'Keeffe
first, with no knowledge of Meyers, is apt to wonder why so many pages are
devoted to excruciatingly detailed sorting out of dates and meetings and so
forth. The reason</span><span style="font-family: "arial unicode ms";">—</span><span style="font-family: "times new roman";">occasionally revealed in an endnote, less
often in an outright textual reference</span><span style="font-family: "arial unicode ms";">—</span><span style="font-family: "times new roman";">is that O'Keeffe is striving to write a <i>definitive</i></span><span style="font-family: "times new roman";"> biography, to basically blow his only
competitor out of the water so far as the <i>facts</i></span><span style="font-family: "times new roman";"> of the matter go. Sometimes O'Keeffe is
fascinating and richly detailed on very interesting matters indeed; at other
times, he goes on at spectacular length on quite trivial matters.</span></div>
<div class="Body1">
<br /></div>
<div class="Body1">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman";">I haven't read all
the way through Meyers's <i>The Enemy</i></span><span style="font-family: "times new roman";">
yet, so comparisons must be provisional. But here's a few anyway:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></div>
<div class="Body1">
<br /></div>
<div class="Body1">
<span style="font-family: "arial unicode ms";">•</span><span style="font-family: "times new roman";">O'Keeffe is a more graceful and subtle
writer than Meyers by far; sometimes his style rises to real pitches of
musicality that I enjoy very much. But Meyers is far more forceful and
straightforward, and cuts to the chase when he needs to: there's a lot to be
said for that.</span></div>
<div class="Body1">
<br /></div>
<div class="Body1">
<span style="font-family: "arial unicode ms";">•</span><span style="font-family: "times new roman";">Which leads to the very obvious fact that
O'Keeffe could have used some grim and relentless editing. <i>Some Sort of
Genius</i></span><span style="font-family: "times new roman";"> is a biography
that is weighed down, at times almost sunk, by the accumulation of detail. It's
good to know that Lewis was <i>expelled</i></span><span style="font-family: "times new roman";"> from The Slade</span><span style="font-family: "arial unicode ms";">—</span><span style="font-family: "times new roman";">a fact which O'Keeffe has feretted out,
but Meyers is completely innocent of. It's less fascinating to be given the
term-by-term numbers of how many times Lewis signed in for his classes, and how
many times he had a friend forge his signature. (<i>That</i></span><span style="font-family: "times new roman";">, I'm afraid, is the biographer showing
off his research.)</span></div>
<div class="Body1">
<br /></div>
<div class="Body1">
<span style="font-family: "arial unicode ms";">•</span><span style="font-family: "times new roman";">The paper trail of Lewis's early life is
distressingly scanty. Meyers passes breezily over everything until his public
emergence in his mid-twenties in London; O'Keeffe shows us every scrap he has
accumulated, alas not particularly to any illuminating effect. When the paper
trail gets better established, then both biographers begin expanding. But
Meyers has the edge here, for his attention is more firmly fixed on the
writing, the painting, the <i>work</i></span><span style="font-family: "times new roman";">
in short. Neither biographer provides the kind of rich examination of the works
that one gets in Edgar Johnson's life of Sir Walter Scott, for instance, or A.
David Moody's recently completed (and triumphant) life of Pound, but Meyers
provides a somewhat better sense of what's going on in each book, and why each
new canvas is important. (On the other hand, O'Keeffe will let you know what
sort of advance Lewis received for each book, and how long he kept the
publisher waiting, and so forth</span><span style="font-family: "arial unicode ms";">—</span><span style="font-family: "times new roman";">even if sometimes it's not quite clear
whether the book is a novel or a set of essays or whatever.)</span></div>
<div class="Body1">
<br /></div>
<div class="Body1">
<span style="font-family: "arial unicode ms";">•</span><span style="font-family: "times new roman";">Meyers is frankly a lot better at setting
Lewis in the context of modernism as a movement and as a congeries of disparate
talents. He's better at managing his cast of characters, showing them as
important writers/painters/artists in their own right, rather than as walk-ons
in the drama of Wyndham Lewis's life (as they appear in O'Keeffe).</span></div>
<div class="Body1">
<br /></div>
<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: small; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">Ultimately I'm not really happy with either
of these biographies. I'll take Meyers as a solidly-reading,
well-contextualized life, which gives a clear sense of Lewis's role among the
"men of 1914" and why we ought to take Lewis seriously. But if I want
to check a fact or a date, or untangle the intricacies of a particular
imbroglio, I'll turn to O'Keeffe. His book is, after all, now the biography of
record. But it's a long way from the biography Lewis deserves, I think.</span>
Mark Scrogginshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01431113440875342809noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11295909.post-1857296031283716752016-09-11T10:24:00.002-04:002016-09-11T10:24:50.494-04:00reading notes: Paul O'Keeffe on Wyndham Lewis<div class="MsoNormal">
Paul O’Keeffe, <i>Some Sort of Genius: A Life of Wyndham
Lewis</i><span style="font-style: normal;"> (2000; London: Pimlico, 2001)</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I started and abandoned <i>The Enemy</i><span style="font-style: normal;">, </span><span style="font-style: normal;">Jeffrey Meyers’s 1980 biography of Wyndham Lewis, a couple of times, though I’m not quite sure why.
O’Keeffe is certainly a more graceful writer, but in the long run I don't know
whether he has the interpretive edge over Meyers—though he certainly has
amassed far more data, and has gone over the documentary record far, far more
closely.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
(A bit irritating, indeed, how O’Keeffe lets his reader know
how he has gone through years of sign-in records for the National Gallery or
the Slade School, or through tax records, or whatever, <i>in his own text</i><span style="font-style: normal;">.)</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I commented on Facebook how Lewis comes across in this text as a
“colossal jerk,” at least in his early years; now I’m into his late thirties,
and he shows no signs of turning into a likeable figure. Clearly, O’Keeffe has
not gone to any exculpatory pains with Lewis, often singling out a particularly
jerkish action and letting it stand at the end of a chapter or a section of a
chapter like a ghoulish punctuation mark. Judged just on those actions—the
string of cast-off mistresses and illegitimate children, the constant
receptions of financial largesse responded to with surly incivility—Lewis comes
across as someone who is certainly “some sort of genius,” but not someone with
whom one might want to hang out. (Indeed, given the number of people who
precisely <i>did</i><span style="font-style: normal;"> want to hang out with
Lewis—lovers, painters, writers—it’s got to be counted against O’Keeffe that he
isn’t able or willing to convey precisely what people found so magnetic and
interesting about the man. And that, I’d venture to say, might be one of the
biography’s ultimate failures.)</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
O’Keeffe fails to convey a convincing portrait of Lewis’s
interiority, which I think is what a reader most hankers for in a biography,
especially a biography of a writer. I’ve gotten to Lewis’s late thirties now;
we’ve already passed through the Vorticist period, <i>Blast</i><span style="font-style: normal;">, </span><i>Tarr</i><span style="font-style: normal;">,
and a great deal of his most vital visual art. (I’d guess </span><i>all</i><span style="font-style: normal;"> of his most vital visual art, since now he’s at the
point where he’s mostly doing portraits.) And I still don’t have a very clear
picture of what makes Lewis “tick,” as it were. I suspect—indeed, I’m
convinced—that this is because of a paucity of documentary evidence. There
simply isn’t very much from Lewis’s own pen in his early years </span><i>about
himself</i><span style="font-style: normal;">, or at least if there is O’Keeffe
hasn’t quoted or paraphrased it.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
O’Keeffe is not very good, it must be said, on the visual
art. He can describe a picture adequately, but there’s no sense whatsoever of
what place Lewis’s art has within art history as a whole—where he comes by his
style, what makes his style vital and interesting, "new." We get an adequate account
of his break with the Omega Workshop/Bloomsbury (Fry, Grant, Bell), but it’s
told more in terms of a personal break with Bloomsbury than as a matter of
artistic principle. We get almost nothing about what Lewis’s own principles of
art might be, aside from some fleeting, anecdotal business distinguishing his own
work from the Italian Futurists. The whole very interesting business of
Vorticism is passed over painfully rapidly.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
One would hope for more from O’Keeffe’s treatment of Lewis’s
writing, given that he’s edited <i>Tarr</i><span style="font-style: normal;"> for
the Black Sparrow Lewis edition. Unfortunately, there’s almost nothing. Aside
from some occasional comments, and a good deal of detailed description of the
business of publishing Lewis’s work, O’Keeffe gives us almost no sense of
what’s interesting or striking about Lewis’s writing, or what distinguishes it
(say) from Joyce’s </span><i>Portrait</i><span style="font-style: normal;">,
which is presented as proceeding in tandem (at least in terms of publication)
with </span><i>Tarr</i><span style="font-style: normal;">.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
So in the end we have this enormously detailed, rather fat
volume chronicling the life of a major painter and writer which is very good
indeed on the details of his movements, his lodgings, his financial
arrangements, his amorous entanglements, and his business dealings; but which
is very sketchy on the <i>work</i><span style="font-style: normal;"> that prompts
our interest in the writer, and which doesn’t really in the end convey a
convincing picture of what makes this alternately energetic and otiose figure
tick, what motivates him.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
But I’m only 2/5 through the book; I’m hoping things will
pick up in the latter portions, when Lewis’s paper trail becomes more concrete.</div>
Mark Scrogginshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01431113440875342809noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11295909.post-91030116831136508832016-04-12T22:52:00.001-04:002016-04-12T22:53:42.516-04:0012 april 2016Hannah Sullivan's book <i>The Work of Revision</i> (did I mention how generally excellent it is?) captured a long-held desire of mine to think about and perhaps theorize the process of revision. I'm certainly planning on mining its bibliography.<br />
<br />
But thinking about revision sent me to an alas as-yet-not-properly examined shopping bag of books I picked up over the New Year's holiday in Sarasota and Sanibel, and digging out a collection edited by Judith Kennedy, <i>Victorian Authors and Their Works: Revision Motivations and Modes</i> (Ohio University Press, 1991). It has essays—unfortunately brief ones—on a variety of important writers of the period, from Carlyle to Conrad. So I read Kennedy's introduction, and a couple of the essays.<br />
<br />
Or I should say Kennedy's "Preface," for it's not really long enough or searching enough to be a proper introduction. She nods towards what she calls a "recent surge of interest" in textual scholarship, then gives a too-hasty overview of the shift from Greg-Bowers methodology to the "social text" thought of McGann and Shillingsburg. It's <i>way</i> too hasty—undigested even—and pales beside the careful, scrupulous, and inventive way Sullivan dovetails an account of that same shift with a description of attitudes towards revision in her own first chapter.<br />
<br />
Only two chapters of Kennedy's collection actually read. Susan Shatto provides a quick-n-nasty overview of how Tennyson composed <i>Maud</i> (desultorily, for himself, then finishing when there was the prospect of a publication contract and money). Fred Kaplan tells again the story of John Stuart Mill's maid accidentally burning the manuscript of Part I of Carlyle's <i>French Revolution</i>, and of Carlyle having to compose the whole thing over again. What's striking is that a very few scraps (all burnt around the edges) of that first manuscript have survived, and their words seems to be pretty much precisely duplicated in the book as Carlyle actually (re)wrote it. Did he treasure up those scraps of prose, incorporating them into his new text when he got to the right place? Or Carlyle (as Kaplan tends to think) simply have such a retentive and capacious memory that he was able to largely <i>reconstruct</i> the whole book as he originally wrote it?<br />
<br />
***<br />
<br />
Peter O'Leary's <i>The Sampo</i>, now read (slowly, with feeling), is magnificent. It makes me wonder if there isn't (or shouldn't be) some movement back towards outright <i>narrative</i> among the few poets I follow and value.Mark Scrogginshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01431113440875342809noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11295909.post-18742698679826396272016-04-11T13:06:00.002-04:002016-04-11T13:06:29.825-04:0011 april 2016It's been ages; no excuses, though this has been a wearying semester, punctuated with some fine conference visits and some good music. I've resolved to begin writing in this space again.<br />
<br />
First, a bit of self-promotion:<br />
<br />
Mentioned earlier on this blog, but as yet unlinked (I think), I have two recently published books:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.uapress.ua.edu/product/Intricate-Thicket,6241.aspx">Intricate Thicket: Reading Late Modernist Poetries</a> is out from the University of Alabama Press; it collects essays and long-form reviews that I've written over the past 15 years or more. I'm rather proud of many of the pieces here.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.mcfarlandbooks.com/book-2.php?id=978-1-4766-6307-4">Michael Moorcock: Fiction, Fantasy and the World's Pain</a> is out from McFarland; it's a rather lighter affair, falling somewhere between fanboy-enthusiasm and real live criticism. But it <i>is</i> frankly the most comprehensive book on Moorcock out there, so if you're a fan you really ought to buy it.<br />
<br />
***<br />
<br />
What I've been reading lately, and what I'm reading:<br />
<br />
Just finished a third go-through of Geoffrey Hill's <i>Selected Poems</i> (Yale, 2006). I've been forcing my graduate creative writing students to work through this one over the course of the semester, just to give them a taste of late high modernism and high formalism (and frankly, because I love Hill's work). It's weird to work with a selection, rather than the single volumes I usually teach out of; I'm always trying to lay my finger on a particular poem or section of a longer thing, only to find that it hasn't been included. And I note how the volume tapers off towards the end—<i>Scenes from Comus</i> and <i>Without Title</i> are only very scantily represented—as if to catch breath before the grand explosion of work that Hill's released over the past decade—the last 1/3 or so of <i>Broken Hierarchies</i>, the vast 2013 collected poems.<br />
<br />
<i>The Kalevala</i>, in its 1907 Kirby translation, despite the <i>Hiawatha</i>-meter into which the translator has predictably cast it, is highly readable indeed. I'm not sure whether the book wouldn't have moldered indefinitely on my shelves if I hadn't taken it down to gear up for a serious plunge into Peter O'Leary's fantastic recasting of portions, now available from the Cultural Society as <a href="http://culturalsociety.org/texts/poems/the-sampo-by-peter-oleary/">The Sampo</a>. This one is not to be missed: all of O'Leary's characteristic energy and verbal invention, in the service of high fantasy. Or—to call it what it is—sword and sorcery!<br />
<br />
Hannah Sullivan's <i>The Work of Revision</i> (Harvard, 2013) is a pretty splendid piece of criticism. I confess to reading fewer books of criticism these days than I did, say, two decades ago. But I was pleasantly surprised over the summer by books by Brian Reed, Chris Nealon, and Gordon Teskey, and since have found myself reacquiring the taste. (Part of it, I think, is getting my own two books out the door, and being able as it were to take a breath.) Sullivan's book is for the most part gracefully written and more importantly just generally <i>smart</i>. She takes all that we already knew about writers' revisionary processes (both pre- and post-publication) and sorts it into a general theory of the cultural importance of revising, reaching a kind of apotheosis in the Creative Writing Industry's making revision a kind of index of "real" writing. Which is, as she points out, an inheritance of high modernism, a way of thinking that would have been utterly alien to the Romantics. Her book is chock full of insights in particular authors, and does a really fine job of taxonomizing various types of revision.<br />
<br />
As usual, I'm dipping into and digging into various slim volumes of contemporary verse. I hope to begin noting them in depth—as I hope to be updating the blog at rather more decent intervals.Mark Scrogginshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01431113440875342809noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11295909.post-28563526987440809722015-12-14T13:39:00.002-05:002015-12-14T13:39:34.943-05:00cont.I'm about a third of the way through indexing the book—that is, entering all my highlighted elements into an alphabetized document—and I figure I'm working at the rate of about ten pages a hour, twelve when I'm doing well. That's not bad at all, but I'm sure not going to get rich doing this.<br />
<br />
My drummer-colleague in the history department as a 900-page manuscript he needs indexed; he tells me he's contacted an indexer who'd do it for $1.50 a page; which seems rather low—<a href="http://www.wfwbooks.com/howto.htm">this</a> page recommends expecting between $4 and $6 per page for an academic book. Even if we take that top number ($6) and my fastest rate (12 pp. an hour), we need to figure in probably at least as much time spent going over the proofs in a preliminary fashion. So 6 pages an hour, all told, at $6 a page = $36 an hour.<br />
<br />
That seems like an impressive number, or at least it would have when I was eighteen. These days, in white-collar land, I feel like I might be working beneath my normal rates. On the other hand, I'm going to come up with an index that I can truly call my own.Mark Scrogginshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01431113440875342809noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11295909.post-17427663957845929932015-12-13T23:30:00.002-05:002015-12-13T23:30:51.754-05:00IndexedSo I read and returned the proofs of <i>Michael Moorcock: Fiction, Fantasy and the World's Pain</i>. By my count, 15 corrections total, and only two of them were the press's mistake. The rest were bits I'd overlooked. Like I said in my last post, a <i>very</i> clean set of proofs.<br />
<br />
Now I'm deep into indexing the book. This is I believe the fifth book I've indexed, and I've gotten into a rhythm with the thing. I read the proofs with three different colors of highlighters at hand; I mark (1) proper names, (2) titles, and (3) concepts/ideas/miscellaneous, each in a different color. Some pages end up looking like Monet paintings; others are relatively white. Then I go back thru, a page at at time, and transfer each marked item to a Word document.<br />
<br />
That sounds pretty slow and painstaking, and, well, it is. I like it that way. By the time I'm done, I know my book inside and out. I know what needs indexing, and what really doesn't. Yes, I've tried it with a PDF of the proofs, doing the word-search thing, and I can easily imagine how that procedure might make the whole business much easier and more palatable for someone who's in a hurry. But there's something about moving from one medium to another—from the printed-out proofs to the Word document—that makes me a bit more careful.<br />
<br />
My antiquated indexing habits (hey, at least I don't use index cards!) make for a better book—at least for me.<br />
<br />
For one thing, I end up reading proofs at least <i>twice</i>. That is, I read once, with pen in hand, for proofing, looking specifically for errors. <i>But I don't send corrections in until I've done the highlighter-armed pre-indexing markup</i>. That means that I've read the entire script, closely, at least twice. It works for me—so far as I can tell, there are fewer than a dozen typos in <i>The Poem of a Life</i>, and less than 10 in <i>Intricate Thicket</i>.<br />
<br />
And I feel that it makes for a better, more comprehensive index. And yes, as one colleague tells me, everyone uses Google Books for their words searches anymore—but they'll be better off using my index for <i>Michael Moorcock</i>, because I can do <i>concepts</i>, which Google Books can't.<br />
<br />
My new life motto: I am an anorak, and proud of it.Mark Scrogginshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01431113440875342809noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11295909.post-72381447439901963632015-12-08T10:18:00.003-05:002015-12-08T10:18:55.074-05:00NotedI've been feeling not great about my writing lately, so it was a mixed blessing to get page proofs for my forthcoming <a href="http://www.mcfarlandbooks.com/book-2.php?id=978-1-4766-6307-4">Michael Moorcock: Fiction, Fantasy and the World's Pain</a>, which should be out (hopefully early) in the new year. But reading the proofs, in the interstices of grading papers and preparing exams, has actually been kind of fun. For one thing, they're really, really <i>clean</i>—very few corrections necessary. (I pat myself on the head for that, frankly—I gave them a clean ms to work with.)<br />
<br />
And I've been having a ball reading the reference notes, and am reminded of one of the things that I love about doing criticism/scholarship. I try really hard to project a kind of <i>sprezzatura</i> in my text, to just "toss out" whatever insights I have come to as if they're perfectly obvious. But it's in the notes that I record my real labors, all the various texts I've collated, the stuff I've brought together and thought about and disentangled.<br />
<br />
When I re-read my own notes—and this is true of <i>The Poem of a Life: A Biography of Louis Zukofsky</i>, especially—I can't help thinking, <i>damn, this guy knows some stuff, he's read a bunch of books</i>. The notes are a kind of gesture towards the clichéd 9-10ths of the iceberg that's out of view; the text is the visible portion.Mark Scrogginshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01431113440875342809noreply@blogger.com0